实时电离层格网数据精度评估

赵金生

doi:10.11728/cjss2020.06.1024

实时电离层格网数据精度评估

doi: 10.11728/cjss2020.06.1024

赵金生

淄博职业学院建筑工程学院淄博 255314

详细信息

作者简介:
赵金生,E-mail:510802578@qq.com

中图分类号: P352
计量
- 文章访问数: 553
- HTML全文浏览量: 34
- PDF下载量: 60
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-06-14
- 修回日期: 2019-11-20
- 刊出日期: 2020-11-15

Assessment of Ionospheric Real-time Data

ZHAO Jinsheng

Department of Building Engineering, Zibo Vocational Institute, Zibo 255314

摘要

摘要: 电离层延迟是制约单频接收机定位精度的重要误差源之一.为提高单频接收机的实时电离层改正精度，需要实时电离层数据.以中国科学院空天信息创新研究院提供的实时电离层数据为例，对比分析不同太阳活动期实时电离层数据及预报电离层数据与IGS最终电离层数据之间的差值以及不同太阳活动期、不同纬度测站的电离层数据对电离层延迟进行改正后得到的定位精度.结果表明:在低太阳活动期和高太阳活动期，实时电离层数据无法很好地反映大部分海洋上空的电离层变化特性；对不同太阳活动期，实时电离层数据在高纬度测站的定位精度优于预报数据和广播模型，在中纬度测站的定位精度略低于预报数据而与广播模型定位精度相当，在低纬度测站的定位精度略优于预报数据和广播模型.
- 电离层 /
- 实时数据 /
- 导航定位
Abstract: Ionospheric delay is one of the major error sources for single-frequency receivers. To improve the accuracy of ionospheric corrections in real-time, some Ionosphere Associate Analysis Centers started to provide real-time global ionospheric data. However, the accuracy of them is unknown. In this sense, this study takes the real-time ionospheric data provided by Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) as an example for assessment. First, the differences between different kinds of ionospheric data are calculated. Meanwhile, positioning accuracy corrected by real-time ionospheric data and ionospheric broadcast ionospheric model over different latitudes for different solar activity periods is presented. The experimental results show that the real-time ionospheric data cannot reflect the spatial variation over the oceanic region for the experimental period. The positioning accuracy corrected by real-time ionospheric data is better than that by ionospheric predicted products and Klobuchar model for high-latitude stations. However, the positioning accuracy corrected by real-time ionospheric data is a bit worse than that of Klobuchar model for mid-latitude stations, while it is better than that corrected by ionospheric predicted products and Klobuchar model for low-latitude stations.
- Ionosphere /
- Real-time ionospheric data /
- Navigation and positioning

HTML全文

参考文献(18)

[1]	LIU Lilong, CHEN Jun, HUANG Liangke, et al. A sophisticated Klobuchar model based on the Holt exponential smoothing model[J]. Sci. Wuhan Univ.: Inf. Sci., 2018, 43(4):599-604
[2]	XIE Shaofeng, CHEN Jun, HUANG Liangke, et al. Ionospheric TEC prediction based on Holt Winters models[J]. J. Geod. Geodyn., 2017, 37(1):72-76
[3]	ZHANG Qiang, ZHAO Qile, ZHANG Hongping, et al. Evaluation on the precision of Klobuchar model for BeiDou navigation satellite system[J]. Sci. Wuhan Univ.: Inf. Sci., 2014, 39(2):142-146
[4]	CAI Chaojun, HUANG Jiang, DENG Baichang, et al. Applicability analysis of IRI-2017 in predicting TEC over Guangzhou region[J]. China. J. Space Sci., 2013, 33(3):277-285. DOI: 10.11728/cjss2013.03.277
[5]	ROMA-DOLLASE D, HERNÁNDEZ-PAJARES M, KRANKOWSKI A, et al. Consistency of seven different GNSS global ionospheric mapping techniques during one solar cycle[J]. J. Geod., 2018, 92(6):691-706. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-017-1088-9
[6]	HAN Ling, WANG Jiexian, LIU Jingbin. NeQuick model algorithm research and performance assessment[J]. Sci. Wuhan Univ.: Inf. Sci., 2018, 43(3):464-470
[7]	KLOBUCHAR J A. Ionospheric time-delay algorithm for single-frequency GPS users[J]. IEEE Trans. Aero. Elec. Sys., 1987, AES-23(3):325-331.DOI:10.1109/TAES. 1987.310829
[8]	ZHANG Xiaohong, MA Fujian, REN Xiaodong, et al. Evaluation of NTCM-BC and a proposed modification for single-frequency positioning[J]. GPS Solut., 2017, 21(4):1535-1548. DOI: 10.1007/s10291-017-0631-8
[9]	CHEN Jun, HUANG Liangke, LIU Lilong, et al. Applicability analysis of VTEC derived from the sophisticated klobuchar model in China[J]. ISPRS Int. J. Geo: Inf., 2017, 6(3):75. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi6030075
[10]	BI Tong, AN Jiachun, YANG Jian, et al. A modified Klobuchar model for single-frequency GNSS users over the polar region[J]. Adv. Space Res., 2017, 59(3):833-842. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2016.10.029
[11]	RAO S S, CHAKRABORTY M, PANDEY R. Ionospheric variations over Chinese EIA region using f_oF₂ and comparison with IRI-2016 model[J]. Adv. Space Res., 2018, 62(1):84-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2018.04.009
[12]	CAI Changsheng, GONG Yangzhao, GAO Yang, et al. An approach to speed up single-frequency ppp convergence with quad-constellation GNSS and GIM[J]. Sensors, 2017, 17(6):DOI: 10.3390/s17061302
[13]	WANG Ningbo, YUAN Yunbin, LI Zishen, et al. Improvement of Klobuchar model for GNSS single-frequency ionospheric delay corrections[J]. Adv. Space Res., 2016, 57(7):1555-1569. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2016.01.010
[14]	NIE Z X, YANG H Z, ZHOU P Y, et al. Quality assessment of CNES real-time ionospheric products[J]. GPS Solut., 2019, 23(1):15. DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2016.01.010
[15]	HERNÁNDEZ-PAJARES M, JUAN J M, SANZ J, et al. The IGS VTEC maps: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998[J]. J. Geod., 2009, 83(3):263-275. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-008-0266-1
[16]	LI M, YUAN Y, WANG N, et al. Performance of various predicted GNSS global ionospheric maps relative to GPS and JASON TEC data[J]. GPS Solut., 2018, 22(2):55. DOI: 10.1007/s10291-018-0721-2
[17]	(李涌涛, 李建文, 代桃高, 等. 太阳活动对电离层TEC变化影响分析[J]. 空间科学学报, 2018, 38(6):847-854 LI Yongtao, LI Jianwen, DAI Taogao, et al. Influence of solar activity on ionospheric TEC Change[J]. China J. Space Sci., 2018, 38(6):847-854
[18]	FENG Jiandi, WANG Zhengtao, ZHAO Zhenzhen. Analysis of temporal variation of global ionosphere based on IGS[J]. Sci. Surv. Mapp., 2015, 40(2):13-17