一种基于白谱法的电离层天气扰动指数

赵瑜馨; 毛田; 陈洲; 王劲松

doi:10.11728/cjss2017.03.270

一种基于白谱法的电离层天气扰动指数

doi: 10.11728/cjss2017.03.270

1. 中国气象局中国气象科学研究院北京 100081;
2. 中国气象局空间天气重点开放实验室国家空间天气监测预警中心北京 100081;
3. 南昌大学空间科学与技术研究院南昌 330031

基金项目:

国家高技术研究发展计划项目（2014AA123503）和国家自然科学重点基金项目（40931056，41404136）共同资助

详细信息

作者简介:
王劲松,wangjs@cma.gov.cn

中图分类号: P352
计量
- 文章访问数: 1088
- HTML全文浏览量: 53
- PDF下载量: 1813
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-01-15
- 修回日期: 2016-03-18
- 刊出日期: 2017-05-15

Ionospheric Weather Disturbance Indices Based on Spectral Whitening

1. Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081;
2. Key Laboratory for Space Weather, National Center for Space Weather, Beijing 100081;
3. Institute of Space and Technology, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031

摘要

摘要: 基于一种电离层扰动提取方法——白谱法，利用IGS提供的电离层TEC网格数据，获得电离层J_s指数、J_r指数和J_p指数，分别反映单站、纬度圈（沿经度积分）及行星际尺度下的电离层天气扰动状态.在2015年3月的一次磁暴过程中，J_s指数、J_r指数及J_p指数均很好地反映出电离层响应地磁暴的过程，磁暴前后J_p指数与Dst指数相关系数达到-0.72；J_s图从二维角度很好地表征了电离层天气的扰动过程.在此基础上，统计分析了2011——2014年J_p指数与Dst指数的相关性，结果表明：限定J_p≥2，J_p指数与对应时间Dst指数的相关系数为-0.67；限定J_p≥3，二者相关系数更高，达到-0.87.通过分析不同J_p指数阈值下不同等级磁暴的次数，发现J_p指数可以很好地反映磁暴下的电离层整体扰动，为指示电离层天气状态提供了可能的参数.
- 电离层扰动 /
- 磁暴 /
- 白谱法 /
- TEC
Abstract: A Spectral Whitening Method (SWM) is introduced and applied in the study of ionospheric weather disturbances to calculate J_s, J_r and J_p indices on the basis of Total Electron Content (TEC) data provided by IGS. These indices can reflect the disturbances of ionospheric weather of single station, latitude circle (integral along longitude) and the whole planet separately. During a geomagnetic storm in March 2015, all three indices well reflect the ionospheric disturbances. The correlation coefficient between J_p and Dst indices reaches -0.72, and the 2D images of ionospheric disturbances can be well captured by J_s map. The correlation coefficient between J_p index and Dst index, from 2011 to 2014, reaches -0.67 if J_p is greater than or equal to 2, and the correlation coefficient can reach -0.87 if J_p is greater than or equal to 3. By analyzing the frequencies of different levels of geomagnetic storms under different threshold values of J_p index, the results suggest that J_p index, as a possible characterization parameter of ionospheric weather condition, can well reflect planetary ionospheric disturbances during geomagnetic storms.
- Ionospheric disturbance /
- Geomagnetic storm /
- SWM /
- TEC

HTML全文

参考文献(21)

[1]	BREMER J, LASTOVICKA J, TULUNAY Y. Influence of the interplanetary magnetic field on the variability of the mid-latitude F₂-layer[J]. Ann. Geophys., 1996, 15(2):91
[2]	FORBES J M, PALO S E, ZHANG X. Variability of the ionosphere[J]. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2000, 62(8):685-693
[3]	RISHBETH H. How the thermospheric circulation affects the ionospheric F₂-layer[J]. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 1998, 60(14):1385-1402
[4]	RISHBETH H, MENDILLO M. Patterns of F₂-layer va-ria-bi-lity[J]. J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 2001, 63(15): 1661-1680
[5]	TAO Y U, WAN W, LIU L, et al. Analysis of global TEC annual and semi-annual variations by using IGS data[J]. Chin. J. Geophys., 2006, 49(4):841-847
[6]	LIU L B, WAN W X, CHEN Y D, et al. Solar activity effects of the ionosphere: A brief review[J]. Chin. Sci. Bull., 2011, 56(12):1202-1211
[7]	XIAO Z, SHIMEI Y U, SHI H, et al. A brief of recent research progress on ionospheric disturbances[J]. Sci. China Inf. Sci., 2013, 56(12):1-9
[8]	ZHAO B, WAN W, LIU L. Responses of equatorial anomaly to the October-November 2003 superstorms[J]. Ann. Geophys., 2005, 23(3):693-706
[9]	CHEN Y, LIU L, LE H, et al. Geomagnetic activity effect on the global ionosphere during 2007——2009 deep solar minimum[J]. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 2014, 119(5):3747-3754
[10]	WEI Y, ZHAO B Q, LI G Z, et al. Electric field penetration into Earth's ionosphere: a brief review for 2000——2013[J]. Sci. Bull., 2015, 60(8):748-761
[11]	JAKOWSKI N, STANKOV S M, SCHLUETER S, et al. On developing a new ionospheric perturbation index for space weather operations[J]. Adv. Space Res., 2006, 38(11):2596-2600
[12]	GULYAEVA T L, STANISLWSKA I, TOMASIK M. Ionospheric weather: cloning missed f₀F₂ observations for derivation of variability index[J]. Ann. Geophys., 2008, 26(2):315-321
[13]	GULYAEVA T L, STANISLAWSKA I. Derivation of a planetary ionospheric storm index[J]. Ann. Geophys., 2008, 26(9):2645-2648
[14]	MIELICH J, BREMER J. A modified index for the description of the ionospheric short- and long-term activity[J]. Ann. Geophys., 2010, 28(12):2227-2236
[15]	WANG J S, CHEN Z, HUANG C M. A method to ide-ntify aperiodic disturbances in the ionosphere[J]. Ann. Geophys., 2014, 32(5):563-569
[16]	CHEN Z, WANG J S, HUANG C M, et al. A new pair of indices to describe the relationship between ionosphe-ric disturbances and geomagnetic activity[J]. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys., 2014, 119(12):10156-10163
[17]	BRUCE J W, GIBLIN P J, et al. Curves and singularities[J]. Math. Gazette, 1993, 10(77):106-113
[18]	GONZALEZ W D, JOSELYN J A, KAMIDE Y, et al. What is a geomagnetic storm[J]. J. Geophys. Res. Spa-ce Phys., 1994, 99(A4):5771-5792
[19]	KUTIEV I, MUHTAROV P. Modeling of mid-latitude F region response to geomagnetic activity[J]. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 2001, 106(A8):15501-15510
[20]	TIAN M, WANG J S, YANG G L, et al. Effects of typhoon Matsa on ionospheric TEC[J]. Chin. Sci. Bull., 2009, 55(8):712-717
[21]	ZHANG D H, MO X H, CAI L, et al. Impact factor for the ionospheric total electron content response to solar flare irradiation[J]. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 2011, 116(A4):1451-1453