Effects of Particle Size and Measurement Technique on Mid-Infrared Spectral Characteristics of Typical Lunar Minerals
-
摘要: 遥感光谱探测技术是识别天体表面物质成分与物理状态的重要手段。其中,中红外(Mid-InfraRed, MIR)光谱对矿物晶体结构、化学组成与物理状态具有显著诊断能力。MIR反射光谱中的克里斯琴森特征(Christiansen Feature, CF)、剩余射线带(Reststrahlen Bands, RBs)与透明特征(Transparency Feature, TF)等,共同构成了识别矿物成分与粒径等物理属性的光谱指标体系。目前,MIR反射光谱的实验室测量方式主要包括双锥时漫反射、定向-半球积分反射及显微反射等。然而,受实验条件与样品状态限制,现有矿物识别与粒径预测模型常基于不同方式测量数据建立,这可能导致光谱特征出现系统性偏移与粒径效应差异,进而影响模型的外推适用性。为此,本研究选取月表典型矿物——橄榄石、辉石和斜长石为对象,将其制备为五个特征粒径区间(<26 μm, 26~43 μm, 43~74 μm, 74~125 μm, 125~200 μm)的样品,分别开展单颗粒显微反射、粉末堆积样品双锥式漫反射,以及定向-半球积分反射光谱测试。通过提取并系统对比六类关键MIR光谱参数,本研究定量揭示了方法间光谱参数的偏移规律与粒径依赖性差异,进而明确了显微反射、双锥式漫反射和定向-半球积分反射三种方法在粒径预测与矿物成分识别中的适用范围及数据互用性条件,为遥感光谱模型的构建与解译提供了关键方法学依据。Abstract: Remote sensing is a crucial technique for identifying the composition and physical state of materials on celestial surfaces. Among various methods, mid‑infrared (MIR) spectroscopy offers significant diagnostic capability for determing mineral crystal structures, chemical composition, and physical states. Spectral indicators such as the Christiansen Feature (CF), Reststrahlen Bands (RBs), and Transparency Feature (TF) in MIR reflectance spectra collectively form a spectroscopic framework for identifying mineral composition and physical properties like particle size. Currently, laboratory measurements of MIR reflectance spectra primarily include bi-conical diffuse reflectance, directional‑hemispherical integrated reflectance, and micro‑reflectance techniques. However, constrained by experimental conditions and sample states, existing models for mineral identification and particle‑size prediction are often built on data acquired through different measurement methods, which may lead to systematic shifts in spectral features and variations in particle‑size effects, thereby limiting the extrapolation applicability of such models. To address this issue, this study elected typical lunar surface minerals—olivine, pyroxene, and plagioclase—prepared as samples across five characteristic particle‑size ranges (<26 μm, 26~43 μm, 43~74 μm, 74~125 μm, 125~200 μm), and performed spectroscopic measurements using micro‑reflectance on signle particle, bi-conical diffuse reflectance and directional‑hemispherical reflectance on powdered samples. By extracting and comparing six key MIR spectral parameters, we quantitatively revealed the systematic offsets and particle‑size dependencies of these parameters across different measurement methods. Futhermore, it clarified the respective applicability and data interoperability conditions of micro‑reflectnace, bi-conical diffuse reflectance, and directional‑hemispherical reflectance methods for particle‑size prediction and mineral identification. These findings provide essential methodological support for the construction and interpretation of remote‑sensing spectral models.
-
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 22
- HTML全文浏览量: 2
- PDF下载量: 0
-
被引次数:
0(来源:Crossref)
0(来源:其他)
下载: