Volume 39 Issue 6
Nov.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Chinese Journal of Space Science  > 2019  >  39(6): 816-823
XIA Mingfei, HU Shengbo, MO Jinrong, SHI Yanfeng, YAN Tingting, LEI Tao, QIN Chanchan. Effects of Geometry Configurations on Ambiguity Function for Cluster Flight Netted Radar[J]. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2019, 39(6): 816-823. doi: 10.11728/cjss2019.06.816
Citation: XIA Mingfei, HU Shengbo, MO Jinrong, SHI Yanfeng, YAN Tingting, LEI Tao, QIN Chanchan. Effects of Geometry Configurations on Ambiguity Function for Cluster Flight Netted Radar[J]. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2019, 39(6): 816-823. doi: 10.11728/cjss2019.06.816
shu

Effects of Geometry Configurations on Ambiguity Function for Cluster Flight Netted Radar

doi: 10.11728/cjss2019.06.816 cstr: 32142.14.cjss2019.06.816

  • 1 Institute of Intelligent Information Processing, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025;

  • 2 Xichang Satellite Launch Center, Xichang 615000

  • Received Date: 2018-07-05
  • Rev Recd Date: 2019-04-02
  • Publish Date: 2019-11-15
    Abstract
  • Network radar is composed of several space-separated, independent and cooperative radars. Compared with traditional single base station radar and dual base station radar, network radar has many advantages. In this paper, the concept of cluster flight netted radar integrated of the cluster flight spacecraft and the netted radar is proposed. The geometry of bistatic radar, the geometry of near-circular orbit cluster flight bistatic radar and the topology model of near-circular orbit cluster flight netted radar are calculated. The definition and calculation steps of the ambiguity function for the cluster flight netted radar are given using the ambiguity function for the conventional bistatic radar. The effects of geometry configuration and the variable baseline on ambiguity function are presented. The numerical calculation shows that the main lobe width of the ambiguity function of the netted radar is obviously narrowed compared with the single radar, and the variable baseline has little influence on the radar ambiguity function. The radar ambiguity function is mainly affected by the target flight speed and the distance. Finally, an upper bound of ambiguity function of cluster flight netted radar is given.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(30)
  • [1]
    BAKER C, HUME A. Netted radar sensing[J]. IEEE Aero. El. Sys. Mag., 2003, 18(2):3-6
    [2]
    HURLEY S, KHAN M. Netted radar:network communications design and optimization[J]. Ad. Hoc. Network, 2011, 9:736-751
    [3]
    LI Mingliang, JIANG Qiuxi, PENG Zhenwei. Target location and tracking of network radar[J]. Fire Control Command Control, 2012, 37(7):77083(李明亮, 姜秋喜, 彭振伟. 基于网络雷达的目标定位跟踪[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2012, 37(7):77083)
    [4]
    DENG H, HIMED B. Target detection using orthogonal netted radar system[C]//Proceedings of IET International Conference on Radar Systems 2007. Edinburgh:Institution of Engineering and Technology, 2007:1-5
    [5]
    LI Yan, ZHANG Qingjun, LIU Yadong, et al. Analysis of moving target indication based on distributed space radar[J]. Spacecraft Eng., 2015, 4(3):64-68(李延, 张庆君, 刘亚东, 等. 分布式天基雷达动目标检测性能分析[J]. 航天器工程, 2015, 4(3):64-68)
    [6]
    BEN De, LONG Weijun. Key technology of space-based radar[J]. J. Data Acquis. Process., 2013, 28(4):391-396(贲德, 龙伟军. 天基雷达的关键技术[J]. 数据采集与处理, 2013, 28(4):391-396)
    [7]
    CHEN Rong. Development of American space-based early warning radar system[J]. Natl. Defense Sci. Technol., 2014, 35(2):76-83(陈荣. 美国天基预警雷达系统发展[J]. 国防科技, 2014, 35(2):76-83)
    [8]
    KANDHALU A, RAJKUMAR R. QoS-based resource allocation for next-generation spacecraft networks[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE 33rd Real Time Systems Symposium, San Juan:IEEE, 2012
    [9]
    WOODWARD P M. Probability and Information Theory, with Applications to Radar[M]. New York:Pergamon Press, 1953
    [10]
    DERHAM T, DOUGHTY S, BAKER C, et al. Ambiguity function spatially coherent and incoherent multistatic radar[J]. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 2010, 46(1):230-245
    [11]
    RENDAS M J D, MOURA J M F. Ambiguity in radar and sonar[J]. IEEE Trans. Sign. Proc., 1998, 46(2):294-305
    [12]
    TENG Y, DOUGHTY S. Netted Radar Theory and Experiment[C]//Proceedings of Information, Decision and Control 2007. Adelaide:IEEE, 2007
    [13]
    TSAO T, SLAMANI M, VARSHNEY P, et al. Ambiguity function for a bistatic radar[J]. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 1997, 33(3):1041-1051
    [14]
    WEINER D, WICKS M, CAPRARO G. Waveform diversity and sensors as robots in advanced military systems[C]//Proceedings of the 1st International Waveform Diversity and Design Conference 2004. Edinburgh:IEEE, 2004
    [15]
    BRADARIC I, CAPRARO G T, WICKS M C. Multistatic ambiguity function a tool for waveform selection in distributed radar systems[C]//Proceedings of International Waveform Diversity and Design Conference 2009. Kissimmee:IEEE, 2009
    [16]
    URKOWITZ H, HAUER C, KOVAL J. Generalized resolution in radar systems[J]. Proc. IRE, 1962, 50:2093-2105
    [17]
    ROSSI M, HAIMOVICH A M, ELDAR Y C. Spatial compressive sensing for mimo radar[J]. IEEE Trans. Sign. Proc., 2014, 64(2):419-430
    [18]
    FISHLER A. Spatial diversity in radars models and detection performance[J]. IEEE Trans. Sign. Proc., 2006, 54(3):823-838
    [19]
    HAIMOVICH A, BLUM R, CIMINI L. MIMO radar with widely separated antenna[J]. IEEE Sign. Proc. Mag., 2007, 25(1):116-129
    [20]
    LI J, STOICA P. MIMO radar with colocated antennas[J]. IEEE Sign. Proc. Mag., 2007, 24(5):106-114
    [21]
    CHITGARHA M, RADMARD M. MIMO radar signal design to improve the MIMO ambiguity function via maximizing its peak[J]. Signal Proc., 2016, 18:139-152
    [22]
    WANG B. The nature of bistatic and multistatic radar[C]//Proceedings of 2001 CIE International Conference on Radar 2001. Beijing:IEEE, 2001
    [23]
    CHEN Y, LU X, QING H, et al. On study of the application of ATM switches in netted-radar systems[C]//Proceedings of NAECON 1997. Ohio:IEEE, 1997
    [24]
    PAPOUTSIS I, BAKER C J, GRIFFITHS H D. Netted radar and the ambiguity function[C]//Proceedings of Radar Conference 2005. Arlington:IEEE, 2005:883-888
    [25]
    TENG Y, BAKER C. Comparison of the 2D and 3D netted radar ambiguity function[C]//Proceedings of the 3rd European Radar Conference 2006. Manchester:IEEE, 2006:112-115
    [26]
    ZIMMERMAN F, GURFIL P. Optimal target states for satellite cluster flight control on near-circular orbit[J]. J. Guid. Control Dynam., 2015, 38(3):1-9
    [27]
    MAZAL L, GURFIL P. Cluster flight for fractionated spacecraft[J]. Adv. Astronaut. Sci., 2011, 140:1545-1564
    [28]
    MAZAL L, GURFIL P. Cluster-keeping algorithms for the SAMSON project[C]//Proceedings of the 63rd International Astronautical Congress 2012. Naples:IAF, 2012:1-5
    [29]
    CHEN H, LI X, YANG J, et al. Effects of geometry configurations on ambiguity properties for bistatic MIMO radar[J]. Prog. Electromagn. Res. B, 2011, 30:117-133
    [30]
    BRADARIC I, CAPRARO G, WEINER D. Multistatic radar systems signal processing[C]//Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Radar 2006. New York:IEEE Radar Conference, 2006:106-113
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(948) PDF Downloads(65) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Journal Introduction

    ISSN 0254-6124       CN 11-1783/V

    Copyright © Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Space Science.  京ICP备08100722号

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.  

    x Close Forever Close

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return