Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
SU Yue, ZHANG Jinxin, LIU Guihong, MA Wentao, YU Yang, WU Zhiheng, WANG Sheng, YANG Xiaofeng, GUANG Jie. High Wind Speed Correction of HY-2 Satellite Microwave Scatterometer Based on Broad Learning System (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2026, 46(2): 1-14 doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.02.2025-0023
Citation: SU Yue, ZHANG Jinxin, LIU Guihong, MA Wentao, YU Yang, WU Zhiheng, WANG Sheng, YANG Xiaofeng, GUANG Jie. High Wind Speed Correction of HY-2 Satellite Microwave Scatterometer Based on Broad Learning System (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2026, 46(2): 1-14 doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.02.2025-0023

High Wind Speed Correction of HY-2 Satellite Microwave Scatterometer Based on Broad Learning System

doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.02.2025-0023
  • Received Date: 2025-02-18
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-05-22
  • Available Online: 2025-05-26
  • Accurate observation of sea surface wind fields is essential for tropical cyclone forecasting and meteorological hazard mitigation. The HY-2 series microwave scatterometer continuously measures Ku-band ocean surface winds. However, its current wind speed retrieval algorithm struggles in high wind conditions and systematically underestimates speeds during extreme events such as typhoons. To address this bias, this study utilized the HY-2 wind speed data of nine tropical cyclones between 2021 and 2022 as the data source. The Stepped Frequency Microwave Radiometer (SFMR) wind speed measurements served as the ground truth. A modeling dataset was constructed by resampling the SFMR reference data to match the 25 km spatial resolution of the HY-2 scatterometer, followed by spatiotemporal matching within a two-hour time window. The matched dataset was then randomly divided into a training set and a testing set at a 7︰3 ratio. Subsequently, the Broad Learning System (BLS) was employed to conduct the regression analysis and develop a high-wind-speed correction model. BLS employs a shallow, flat architecture in which input features are expanded into “enhanced nodes,” avoiding the deep stacks typical of conventional neural networks. This structure reduces computational cost and accelerates convergence while maintaining predictive performance. Validation results demonstrate that the corrected HY-2 wind speeds achieved a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 4.47 m·s–1, representing a 35% improvement compared to the uncorrected data. For wind speeds exceeding 25 m·s–1, the corrected RMSE reached 6.76 m·s–1, marking significant enhancements over the original values of 13.27 m·s–1. Additionally, a comparative analysis using Typhoon Chanthu (in 2021) as a case study revealed that the corrected HY-2C maximum wind speed increased from 22.09 m·s–1 to 32.73 m·s–1, closely matching wind fields retrieved by Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR). Further validation through wind speed profile comparisons confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed model. These results demonstrate that our correction framework markedly improves extreme-wind retrieval accuracy, yielding bias-corrected HY-2 products that are more reliable for applications, such as storm surge simulation and typhoon track forecasting.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    PANDEY R S, LIOU Y A. Typhoon strength rising in the past four decades[J]. Weather and Climate Extremes, 2022, 36: 100446 doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2022.100446
    [2]
    MORI N, TAKEMI T. Impact assessment of coastal hazards due to future changes of tropical cyclones in the North Pacific Ocean[J]. Weather and Climate Extremes, 2015, 11: 53-69
    [3]
    WU C, GRAF J, FREILICH M, et al. The SeaWinds scatterometer instrument[C]//Proceedings of IGARSS'94-1994 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Pasadena: IEEE, 1994: 1511-1515
    [4]
    YANG J G, ZHANG J. Evaluation of ISS-RapidScat wind vectors using buoys and ASCAT data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(4): 648 doi: 10.3390/rs10040648
    [5]
    SAF O S I, Team E W. ASCAT wind product user manual[J]. Version, 2019, 1: 23.
    [6]
    SHIBATA A. AMSR/AMSR-E algorithm development and data distribution[C]//Proceedings of the IGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Taking the Pulse of the Planet: The Role of Remote Sensing in Managing the Environment. Proceedings (Cat. No. 00CH37120). Honolulu: IEEE, 2000: 59-61
    [7]
    BORMANN N, DUNCAN D, ENGLISH S, et al. Growing operational use of FY-3 data in the ECMWF system[J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2021, 38(8): 1285-1298 doi: 10.1007/s00376-020-0207-3
    [8]
    LI X Z, LIN W M, LIU B C, et al. Sea surface wind retrieval using the combined scatterometer and altimeter backscatter measurements of the HY-2B satellite[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 5101312 doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2021.3065663
    [9]
    ZOU J H, ZENG T, CUI S X. A high wind geophysical model fuction for QuikSCAT wind retrievals and application to Typhoon IOKE[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2015, 34(7): 65-73 doi: 10.1007/s13131-015-0698-4
    [10]
    STOFFELEN A, ANDERSON D. Scatterometer data interpretation: measurement space and inversion[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 1997, 14(6): 1298-1313 doi: 10.1175/1520-0426(1997)014<1298:sdimsa>2.0.co;2
    [11]
    WENTZ F J, SMITH D K. A model function for the ocean-normalized radar cross section at 14 GHz derived from NSCAT observations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1999, 104(C5): 11499-11514 doi: 10.1029/98JC02148
    [12]
    FREILICH M H, DUNBAR R S. The accuracy of the NSCAT 1 vector winds: comparisons with National Data Buoy Center buoys[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 1999, 104(C5): 11231-11246 doi: 10.1029/1998JC900091
    [13]
    BOURASSA M A, LEGLER D M, O'BRIEN J J, et al. SeaWinds validation with research vessels[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2003, 108(C2): 3019 doi: 10.1029/2001jc001028
    [14]
    POLVERARI F, PORTABELLA M, LIN W M, et al. On high and extreme wind calibration using ASCAT[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 4202210
    [15]
    兰友国, 郎姝燕, 林明森, 等. 海洋二号卫星A星微波散射计在台风遥感监测中的应用[J]. 卫星应用, 2018(5): 40-42

    LAN Youguo, LANG Shuyan, LIN Mingsen, et al. Application of the Scatterometer on board the HY-2A satellite in typhoon remote sensing monitoring[J]. Satellite Application, 2018(5): 40-42
    [16]
    杨典, 宋清涛, 蒋兴伟, 等. 基于散射计风场数据的台风强度诊断方法——以海洋二号卫星数据为例[J]. 海洋学报, 2019, 41(1): 151-159

    YANG Dian, SONG Qingtao, JIANG Xingwei, et al. A typhoon intensity estimation technique based on scatterometer winds observed from the HY-2 satellite[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2019, 41(1): 151-159
    [17]
    刘思琦, 林文明, 王志雄, 等. 基于HY-2B散射计的热带气旋定位定强研究[J]. 海洋学报, 2021, 43(11): 146-156

    LIU Siqi, LIN Wenming, WANG Zhixiong, et al. Determination of tropical cyclone location and intensity using HY-2B scatterometer data[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2021, 43(11): 146-156
    [18]
    王婧. HY-2A卫星微波散射计高风速海面风场反演模型研究[D]. 广州: 广州大学, 2017: 1314

    WANG Jing. A study of HY-2A Satellite Microwave Scatterometer Sea-surface High-wind Field Retrieval Model[D]. Guangzhou: Guangzhou University, 2017: 1314
    [19]
    金铸钰. 基于CCMP的海面风场特征分析与风速订正方法研究[D]. 北京: 国家海洋环境预报中心, 2022

    JIN Zhuyu. CCMP-Based Analysis of Sea Surface Wind Field Characteristics and Wind Speed Correction Techniques[D]. Beijing: National Marine Environmental Forecasting Center, 2022
    [20]
    吕思睿. 多源卫星海面风场融合研究[D]. 南京: 南京信息工程大学, 2023

    LYU Sirui. Research on Multi-source Satellite Sea Surface Wind Field Fusion[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, 2023
    [21]
    KONG Y, WANG X S, CHENG Y H, et al. Hyperspectral imagery classification based on semi-supervised broad learning system[J]. Remote Sensing, 2018, 10(5): 685 doi: 10.3390/rs10050685
    [22]
    LIU D, BALDI S, YU W W, et al. On training traffic predictors via broad learning structures: a benchmark study[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2022, 52(2): 749-758 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2020.3006124
    [23]
    KUOK S C, YUEN K V. Broad learning for nonparametric spatial modeling with application to seismic attenuation[J]. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2020, 35(3): 203-218 doi: 10.1111/mice.12494
    [24]
    KUOK S C, YUEN K V. Broad learning system for nonparametric modeling of clay parameters[J]. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 2020, 6(2): 04020024 doi: 10.1061/ajrua6.0001066
    [25]
    夏静, 汪胜, 杨晓峰, 等. 宽度学习系统的SAR影像海面强降雨智能检测研究[J]. 遥感学报, 2023, 27(7): 1605-1614

    XIA Jing, WANG Sheng, YANG Xiaofeng, et al. Intelligent detection of rain cells with SAR imagery based on broad learning system[J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2023, 27(7): 1605-1614
    [26]
    ZHANG Y, YUEN K V. Crack detection using fusion features-based broad learning system and image processing[J]. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2021, 36(12): 1568-1584 doi: 10.1111/mice.12753
    [27]
    WANG S, YUEN K V, YANG X F, et al. Tropical cyclogenesis detection from remotely sensed sea surface winds using graphical and statistical features-based broad learning system[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2023, 61: 4203815 doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2023.3266814
    [28]
    MOUCHE A A, CHAPRON B, ZHANG B, et al. Combined Co- and cross-polarized SAR measurements under extreme wind conditions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55(12): 6746-6755 doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2732508
    [29]
    MOUCHE A, CHAPRON B, KNAFF J, et al. Copolarized and cross-polarized SAR measurements for high-resolution description of major hurricane wind structures: application to Irma category 5 hurricane[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2019, 124(6): 3905-3922
    [30]
    UHLHORN E W, BLACK P G, FRANKLIN J L, et al. Hurricane surface wind measurements from an operational stepped frequency microwave radiometer[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2007, 135(9): 3070-3085 doi: 10.1175/MWR3454.1
    [31]
    SAPP J W, ALSWEISS S O, JELENAK Z, et al. Stepped frequency microwave radiometer wind-speed retrieval improvements[J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(3): 214 doi: 10.3390/rs11030214
    [32]
    UHLHORN E W, BLACK P G. Verification of remotely sensed sea surface winds in hurricanes[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2003, 20(1): 99-116 doi: 10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<0099:VORSSS>2.0.CO;2
    [33]
    KNAFF J A, SAMPSON C R, KUCAS M E, et al. Estimating tropical cyclone surface winds: current status, emerging technologies, historical evolution, and a look to the future[J]. Tropical Cyclone Research and Review, 2021, 10(3): 125-150 doi: 10.1016/j.tcrr.2021.09.002
    [34]
    ZHANG G S, LI X F, PERRIE W, et al. A hurricane wind speed retrieval model for C-band RADARSAT-2 cross-polarization ScanSAR images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2017, 55(8): 4766-4774 doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2699622
    [35]
    WANG S, YUEN K V, YANG X F, et al. A nonparametric tropical cyclone wind speed estimation model based on dual-polarization SAR observations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 4208213 doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2022.3188328
    [36]
    ROY C, KOVORDÁNYI R. Tropical cyclone track forecasting techniques―a review[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2012, 104-105: 40-69
    [37]
    WANG S, YANG X F, LI H Y, et al. An improved asymmetric hurricane parametric model based on cross-polarization SAR observations[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2021, 14: 1411-1422 doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2020.3043246
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Figures(8)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(411) PDF Downloads(14) Cited by()
    Visiting Statistics
    Related Articles

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return