Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CHEN Qingyan, JI Yuanfa, SUN Xiyan, LIANG Wenbin, GHAZALI Kamarul Hawari Bin. Prediction of the Ionospheric Irregularities Based on Residual Compensation WHO-RF Model (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2026, 46(3): 1-11 doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.03.2025-0117
Citation: CHEN Qingyan, JI Yuanfa, SUN Xiyan, LIANG Wenbin, GHAZALI Kamarul Hawari Bin. Prediction of the Ionospheric Irregularities Based on Residual Compensation WHO-RF Model (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2026, 46(3): 1-11 doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.03.2025-0117

Prediction of the Ionospheric Irregularities Based on Residual Compensation WHO-RF Model

doi: 10.11728/cjss2026.03.2025-0117 cstr: 32142.14.cjss.2025-0117
  • Received Date: 2025-07-14
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-10-16
  • Available Online: 2025-12-31
  • In response to the difficulties in predicting ionospheric irregularities and the low accuracy and tendency to fall into local optima of a single Random Forest (RF) model in prediction, a RC-WO-RF ionospheric irregularities regression prediction model was constructed by combining the Wild Horse Optimizer (WHO) algorithm with Residual Compensation (RC). Using observation data from the Hong Kong HKWS station from 1 March 2020 to 30 June 2024, the Rate of Total Electron Content Index (ROTI) was calculated, and a series of background ionospheric parameters related to ionospheric irregularities were selected as input features. The results indicate that, ROTI, Cosine phase daily variation factor and geomagnetic activity are crucial for ionospheric irregularities; The root mean square error of the RC-WO-RF model is less than 0.1 TECU·min–1, and it has excellent response capability and prediction accuracy for sudden geomagnetic storm events; The average relative accuracy of the RC-WO-RF model in short-term forecasting 30 min in advance is 90.67%, which is 8.16% higher than the WHO-RF model and 11.2% higher than the single RF model. The prediction performance of the combined model is significantly better than that of the single RF model and the WHO-RF model.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    BASU S, MACKENZIE E, BASU S. Ionospheric constraints on VHF/UHF communications links during solar maximum and minimum periods[J]. Radio Science, 1988, 23(3): 363-378 doi: 10.1029/RS023i003p00363
    [2]
    尚社平, 史建魁, 程征伟, 等. 夏季强对流活动对东亚低纬电离层不规则体影响的事件分析[J]. 空间科学学报, 2022, 42(6): 1111-1121 doi: 10.11728/cjss2022.06.211228135

    SHANG Sheping, SHI Jiankui, CHENG Zhengwei, et al. Event analysis of the influence of strong tropospheric convection in summer on low-latitude ionospheric irregularities in East Asia[J]. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2022, 42(6): 1111-1121 doi: 10.11728/cjss2022.06.211228135
    [3]
    张红波, 王飞飞, 郝书吉, 等. 低纬地区电离层闪烁发生概率预报模型研究[J]. 电波科学学报, 2023, 38(4): 691-697 doi: 10.12265/j.cjors.2023026

    ZHANG Hongbo, WANG Feifei, HAO Shuji, et al. Occurrence probability prediction model of ionospheric scintillation for the low-latitude region[J]. Chinese Journal of Radio Science, 2023, 38(4): 691-697 doi: 10.12265/j.cjors.2023026
    [4]
    PI X, MANNUCCI A J, LINDQWISTER U J, et al. Monitoring of global ionospheric irregularities using the worldwide GPS network[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 1997, 24(18): 2283-2286 doi: 10.1029/97GL02273
    [5]
    LIU L, MORTON Y J, LIU Y X. Machine learning prediction of storm-time high-latitude ionospheric irregularities from GNSS-derived ROTI maps[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2021, 48(20): e2021GL095561 doi: 10.1029/2021GL095561
    [6]
    TETE S, OTSUKA Y, ZAHRA W K, et al. Leveraging machine learning techniques and GPS measurements for precise TEC rate predictions[J]. GPS Solutions, 2024, 28(3): 115 doi: 10.1007/s10291-024-01652-4
    [7]
    HABYARIMANA V, HABARULEMA J B, OKOH D, et al. Single station modelling of ionospheric irregularities using artificial neural networks[J]. Astrophysics and Space Science, 2023, 368(12): 105 doi: 10.1007/s10509-023-04261-8
    [8]
    ATABATI A, ALIZADEH M, SCHUH H, et al. Ionospheric scintillation prediction on S4 and ROTI parameters using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm[J]. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(11): 2092 doi: 10.3390/rs13112092
    [9]
    ZHAO X K, LI G Z, XIE H Y, et al. A novel short‐term prediction model for regional equatorial plasma bubble irregularities in East and Southeast Asia[J]. Space Weather, 2025, 23(2): e2024SW004224 doi: 10.1029/2024SW004224
    [10]
    吴家燕, 甄卫民, 欧明, 等. 一种基于GNSS数据的全球电离层不规则结构活动表征方法[J]. 空间科学学报, 2022, 42(1): 82-90 doi: 10.11728/cjss2022.01.201009088

    WU Jiayan, ZHEN Weimin, OU Ming, et al. A characterization method of global ionospheric irregularities activities based on GNSS data[J]. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2022, 42(1): 82-90 doi: 10.11728/cjss2022.01.201009088
    [11]
    REZENDE L F C, DE PAULA E R, STEPHANY S, et al. Survey and prediction of the ionospheric scintillation using data mining techniques[J]. Space Weather, 2010, 8(6): S06D09 doi: 10.1029/2009sw000532
    [12]
    刘磊. 基于多源数据的电离层建模及暴时电离层扰动分析[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2017

    LIU Lei. Studying on Ionospheric Modeling Using Multi Source Data and Ionospheric Responses to Magnetic Storms[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University, 2017
    [13]
    BREIMAN L. Random forests[J]. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5-32 doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
    [14]
    NARUEI I, KEYNIA F. Wild horse optimizer: a new meta-heuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems[J]. Engineering with Computers, 2022, 38(4): 3025-3056
    [15]
    LIU H, YANG P X, REN X D, et al. The short‐term prediction of low‐latitude ionospheric irregularities leveraging a hybrid ensemble model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024, 62: 4100615 doi: 10.1109/tgrs.2023.3346449
    [16]
    杨芸珍, 刘立龙, 莫诗蕾, 等. 太阳活动高低年广西及周边地区电离层时空频域特性[J]. 空间科学学报, 2024, 44(6): 1021-1030 doi: 10.11728/cjss2024.06.2024-0002

    YANG Yunzhen, LIU Lilong, MO Shilei, et al. Ionospheric TEC variation in Guangxi and surrounding during high and low solar activity years[J]. Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2024, 44(6): 1021-1030 doi: 10.11728/cjss2024.06.2024-0002
    [17]
    王凯, 刘昂, 高为广, 等. 太阳活动高峰期BDS服务性能分析[J]. 导航定位学报, 2025, 13(1): 61-68

    WANG Kai, LIU Ang, GAO Weiguang, et al. Analysis on open service performance of BDS during peak of solar cycle 25[J]. Journal of Navigation and Positioning, 2025, 13(1): 61-68
  • 加载中

Catalog

    Figures(11)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(511) PDF Downloads(93) Cited by()
    Visiting Statistics
    Related Articles

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return