Volume 45 Issue 1
Mar.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
XIA Yifeng, GAO Yuyue, ZHOU Cheng. Analysis and Implications of NASA’s Moon to Mars Strategic Architecture (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2025, 45(1): 15-28 doi: 10.11728/cjss2025.01.2024-0003
Citation: XIA Yifeng, GAO Yuyue, ZHOU Cheng. Analysis and Implications of NASA’s Moon to Mars Strategic Architecture (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2025, 45(1): 15-28 doi: 10.11728/cjss2025.01.2024-0003

Analysis and Implications of NASA’s Moon to Mars Strategic Architecture

doi: 10.11728/cjss2025.01.2024-0003 cstr: 32142.14.cjss.2024-0003
  • Received Date: 2024-01-08
  • Rev Recd Date: 2024-04-28
  • Available Online: 2024-07-08
  • Lunar and Martian exploration ventures embody a magnitude of grand scale, elongated operational timelines, elevated execution complexities, and the engagement of multifaceted mission phases alongside a diverse array of objectives. These inherent characteristics underscore the imperative need for a comprehensive strategic roadmap to navigate these ambitious undertakings. In response, an alliance of institutions under the auspices of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has published the Moon to Mars Architecture Definition Document, thereby furnishing a guiding compass for both lunar and Martian exploration missions. This study commences with an overview of NASA’s meticulously crafted M2M architecture, delving into the intricacies of its strategic goal hierarchy. It proceeds to meticulously untangle the system implementation phases, accompanied by a critical examination of the archetype missions embedded within these phases. The investigation also encompasses a thorough discourse on the criteria utilized for the appraisal of this strategic infrastructure, elucidating the metrics and principles that underpin its evaluation. Through meticulous dissection of the M2M Architecture Definition Document, this research illuminates the nuanced definitions and classifications of strategic objectives, unraveling the systemic functionality requisites across various mission execution stages. Moreover, it conducts a rigorous gap analysis, pinpointing disparities against the backdrop of the strategic architecture’s evaluative benchmarks. Culminating from this exhaustive analysis, the paper advances a forward-thinking perspective, distilled from a meticulous parsing of the “Moon to Mars Architecture”. This perspective aims to illuminate prospective avenues, offering a strategic compass for strategic trajectory planning of our nation’s impending space exploration endeavors, and formulating a holistic blueprint for lunar and Martian exploration programs. It aspires to contribute a set of insightful and actionable recommendations, thereby enriching the strategic discourse and enhancing the practical utility of future mission planning in the realm of celestial exploration.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    JIM L, JEFFREY K. Apollo 13[M], Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2006
    [2]
    BRIAN H. Soviet and Russian lunar exploration[M], Springer Science & Business Media, 2006
    [3]
    NASA, Artemis[EB/OL]. https://www.nasa.gov/feature/artemis/
    [4]
    ISRO, Chandrayaan-2[EB/OL]. https://www.isro.gov.in/Chandrayan_2.html?__cf_chl_tk=sYXZ4I2Zu2EYEWwfBDzs45PdPLss_a_GbmqfliaxcWI-1712744162-0.0.1.1-1642
    [5]
    ESA, ESA STRATEGY FOR SCIENCE AT THE MOON[EB/OL]. https://exploration.esa.int/s/WmMyaoW
    [6]
    ESA, Terrae Novae 2030+ Strategy Roadmap [EB/OL]. https://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/HRE/Terrae_Novae_2030+strategy_roadmap.pdf
    [7]
    PAUL A, BRAD B, DAVE B, et al. The Lunar Exploration Roadmap: Exploring the Moon in the 21st Century: Themes, Goals, Objectives, Investigations, and Priorities, 2013[EB/OL]. https://www.lpi.usra.edu/leag/LER-Version- 1-3-2013.pdf
    [8]
    PAUL A, BRAD B, DAVE B, et al. The Lunar Exploration Roadmap: Exploring the Moon in the 21st Century: Themes, Goals, Objectives, Investigations, and Priorities, 2016[EB/OL]. https://www.lpi.usra.edu/leag/roadmap/US-LER_version_1_point_3.pdf
    [9]
    JEFF F. NASA delays Artemis 2 and 3 missions[R]. 2024
    [10]
    NASA, NASA’S Moon To Mars Architecture A Summary Of The 2022 Architecture Concept Review Process And Results[EB/OL]. https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/acr22-publication-083123.pdf
    [11]
    NASA, Moon-to-Mars Architecture Definition Document [EB/OL]. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20230002706/downloads/M2MADD_ESDMD-001(TP-20230002706).pdf
    [12]
    NASA, Artemis Accord[EB/OL]. https://www.nasa.gov/artemis-accords/
    [13]
    中国国家航天局. 国际月球科研站合作伙伴指南[EB/OL]. https://www.cnsa.gov.cn/n6758823/n6758838/c6812147/content.html
    [14]
    NASA, Gateway Space Station[EB/OL]. https://www.nasa.gov/reference/gateway-about/
    [15]
    MELANIE G, BOB M. Overview of lunar safe haven seedling study for NASA/APL excavation & Construction TIM STMD Game Changing Development Program, 2021.
    [16]
    PALAK P, JOSE S, ZACHARY A, et al. Artemis steelworks: Advancing reactor technologies for electrolytic manufacturing of in-situ steel[EB/OL]. https://bigidea.nianet.org/wp-content/uploads/MIT-Technical-Paper.pdf
    [17]
    LEE M, STEVE O, DAVID J, et al. Nuclear power concepts and development strategies for high-power electric propulsion missions to mars[EB/OL]. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20210016968/downloads/TM-20210016968_final.pdf
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(9)  / Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(1358) PDF Downloads(107) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return