Volume 45 Issue 5
Oct.  2025
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Chunqin, SHEN Guohong, CHANG Zheng, HUANG Cong, ZHANG Shenyi, HOU Donghui, SUN Ying. Monitoring Results of FY-3E Satellite High-energy Particle Detector (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2025, 45(5): 1342-1357 doi: 10.11728/cjss2025.05.2024-0121
Citation: WANG Chunqin, SHEN Guohong, CHANG Zheng, HUANG Cong, ZHANG Shenyi, HOU Donghui, SUN Ying. Monitoring Results of FY-3E Satellite High-energy Particle Detector (in Chinese). Chinese Journal of Space Science, 2025, 45(5): 1342-1357 doi: 10.11728/cjss2025.05.2024-0121

Monitoring Results of FY-3E Satellite High-energy Particle Detector

doi: 10.11728/cjss2025.05.2024-0121 cstr: 32142.14.cjss.2024-0121
  • Received Date: 2024-09-29
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-01-10
  • Available Online: 2025-01-10
  • FY-3E satellite is one of the Fengyun-3 polar orbit meteorological satellite series and also the first morning dusk orbit meteorological satellite in China. The satellite orbits at an altitude of about 830 kilometers with an inclination angle of 98.75°. The high-energy particle detector mounted on the satellite is used to monitor the charged particle radiation environment, which can provide 0.15 MeV to 5.7 MeV high-energy electron and 3 MeV to 300 MeV proton flux data in three directions of the satellite body (–z skyward direction, –x flight reverse direction, and +y vertical orbital plane direction). The data of high-energy protons and electrons monitored by the detector from July 2021 to May 2024 are analyzed, and the spatial distribution and long-term evolution results are obtained in the three directions as follows. The lower the energy, the larger the distribution range, and the more complex the structure, especially for energy electrons, which exhibit multiple stripes at both high latitudes of north and south. Among the three directions, the flux intensity of electrons in the +y direction is the highest, and the –z direction is the smallest. The difference of protons in the three directions is relatively small. The +y direction electrons are most significantly affected by environmental disturbances. The extremely strong geomagnetic storm in May 2024 significantly affects the spatial distribution and flux intensity of both electrons and protons. The data results indicate that the high-energy particle detector can respond sensitively to the dynamics of high-energy particles in space. The measured data can not only support the assessment of orbital environment, serve for the design of spacecraft radiation protection and the secure layout of satellite equipment, but also can help to further understand the dynamic physics process of charged particles in radiation belts during disturbances, especially under the influence of extreme events.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    BAKER D N, ERICKSON P J, FENNELL J F, et al. Space weather effects in the earth’s radiation belts[J]. Space Science Reviews, 2018, 214(1): 17 doi: 10.1007/s11214-017-0452-7
    [2]
    DMITRIEV A V. On the radiation belt location during the 23rd and 24th solar cycles[J]. Annales Geophysicae, 2019, 37(4): 719-732 doi: 10.5194/angeo-37-719-2019
    [3]
    HEYNDERICKX D. Radiation belt modelling in the framework of space weather effects and forecasting[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2002, 64(16): 1687-1700 doi: 10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00119-0
    [4]
    ZHANG P, HU X Q, LU Q F, et al. FY-3E: the first operational meteorological satellite mission in an early morning orbit[J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2022, 39(1): 1-8 doi: 10.1007/s00376-021-1304-7
    [5]
    SHEN G H, ZHANG X X, WANG J H, et al. Development and calibration of a three-directional high-energy particle detector for FY-3E satellite[J]. Aerospace, 2023, 10(2): 173 doi: 10.3390/aerospace10020173
    [6]
    HOU D H, ZHANG X X, WANG J H, et al. Calibration of the FY-3E particle sensors: high-energy particle detector (HEPD)[J]. Journal of Instrumentation, 2023, 18(7): P07050 doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/18/07/P07050
    [7]
    VLASOVA N A, KALEGAEV V V, NAZARKOV I S. Dynamics of relativistic electron fluxes of the outer radiation belt during geomagnetic disturbances of different intensity[J]. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2021, 61(3): 331-340 doi: 10.1134/S0016793221030178
    [8]
    PIERRARD V, BOTEK E, RIPOLL J F, et al. Electron dropout events and flux enhancements associated with geomagnetic storms observed by PROBA-V/Energetic Particle Telescope from 2013 to 2019[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2020, 125(12): e2020JA028487 doi: 10.1029/2020JA028487
    [9]
    CHEN H W T, KALEGAEV V V, PANASYUK M I, et al. Long‐term dropout of relativistic electrons in the outer radiation belt during two sequential geomagnetic storms[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2020, 125(10): e2020JA028098 doi: 10.1029/2020JA028098
    [10]
    ZHENG Y H, LUI A T Y, LI X L, et al. Characteristics of 2-6 MeV electrons in the slot region and inner radiation belt[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2006, 111(A10): A10204 doi: 10.1029/2006JA011748
    [11]
    WANG Chunqin, ZHANG Xianguo, SHEN Guohong, et al. Dynamic results of electron flux in radiation belt from 2011 to 2015 based on FY-3B satellite observation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2021, 64(6): 1831-1841 (王春琴, 张贤国, 沈国红, 等. 2011-2015年辐射带电子动态FY-3B卫星实测结果[J]. 地球物理学报, 2021, 64(6): 1831-1841 doi: 10.6038/cjg2021O0341

    WANG Chunqin, ZHANG Xianguo, SHEN Guohong, et al. Dynamic results of electron flux in radiation belt from 2011 to 2015 based on FY-3B satellite observation[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2021, 64(6): 1831-1841 doi: 10.6038/cjg2021O0341
    [12]
    WANG C Q, CHANG Z, ZHANG X X, et al. Proton belt variations traced back to Fengyun-1C satellite observations[J]. Earth and Planetary Physics, 2020, 4(6): 611-618 doi: 10.26464/epp2020069
    [13]
    LOOPER M D, BLAKE J B, MEWALDT R A. Response of the inner radiation belt to the violent Sun-Earth connection events of October-November 2003[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32(3): L03S06 doi: 10.1029/2004GL021502
    [14]
    LORENTZEN K R, MAZUR J E, LOOPER M D, et al. Multisatellite observations of MeV ion injections during storms[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2002, 107(A9): 1231
    [15]
    YUAN C J, ZONG Q G. Dynamic variations of the outer radiation belt during magnetic storms for 1.5-6.0 MeV electrons[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2011, 54(2): 431-440 doi: 10.1007/s11431-010-4269-9
    [16]
    GOYAL R, ZHAO H, CALIF S, et al. Role of subauroral polarization streams in deep injections of energetic electrons into the inner magnetosphere[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2024, 51(11): e2024GL108863 doi: 10.1029/2024GL108863
    [17]
    SUMMERS D, THORNE R M, XIAO F L. Relativistic theory of wave-particle resonant diffusion with application to electron acceleration in the magnetosphere[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 1998, 103(A9): 20487-20500 doi: 10.1029/98JA01740
    [18]
    HORNE R B, THORNE R M. PotenTial waves for relativistic electron scattering and stochastic acceleration during magnetic storms[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 1998, 25(15): 3011-3014 doi: 10.1029/98GL01002
    [19]
    NI B B, HUA M, GU X D, et al. Artificial modification of Earth’s radiation belts by ground-based Very-Low-Frequency (VLF) transmitters[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2022, 65(3): 391-413 doi: 10.1007/s11430-021-9850-7
    [20]
    SAUVAUD J A, WALT M, DELCOURT D, et al. Inner radiation belt particle acceleration and energy structuring by drift resonance with ULF waves during geomagnetic storms[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2013, 118(4): 1723-1736 doi: 10.1002/jgra.50125
    [21]
    LI X L, BARKER A B, BAKER D N, et al. Modeling the deep penetration of outer belt electrons during the ‘‘Halloween’’ magnetic storm in 2003[J]. Space Weather, 2009, 7(2): S02004 doi: 10.1029/2008SW000418
    [22]
    SELESNICK R S, HUDSON M K, KRESS B T. Injection and loss of inner radiation belt protons during solar proton evenTs and magnetic storms[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2010, 115(A8): A08211 doi: 10.1029/2010JA015247
    [23]
    LI W, HUDSON M K. Earth’s Van Allen radiation belts: from discovery to the Van Allen Probes era[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2019, 124(11): 8319-8351 doi: 10.1029/2018JA025940
    [24]
    SMIRNOV A, SHPRITS Y, ALLISON H, et al. Storm-time evolution of the equatorial electron pitch angle distributions in earth’s outer radiation belt[J]. FronTiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 2022, 9: 836811 doi: 10.3389/fspas.2022.836811
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(21)  / Tables(3)

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(392) PDF Downloads(24) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return